<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>Amarok Blog - aumuell</title>
    <link>http://amarok.kde.org/blog/</link>
    <description>Amarok developers at work</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.1-alpha7 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:49:20 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>OS X first OS to see Amarok 2.0 crash - natively</title>
    <link>http://amarok.kde.org/blog/archives/299-OS-X-first-OS-to-see-Amarok-2.0-crash-natively.html</link>
            <category>aumuell</category>
    
    <comments>http://amarok.kde.org/blog/archives/299-OS-X-first-OS-to-see-Amarok-2.0-crash-natively.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://amarok.kde.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=299</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://amarok.kde.org/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=299</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Martin Aumueller)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Today, we managed to link the freshly ported Amarok 2.0 for the first time. Not on Linux, but on native OS X. It didn&#039;t even crash right away. A first start made it complain about a missing audio engine and run kbuildsycoca. Only a second run made it crash for real. This means that the period where Amarok successfully didn&#039;t compile using cmake is over and is now followed by a period where it sucessfully doesn&#039;t run.&lt;br /&gt;
That&#039;s what we have been waiting for for a couple of days now. Everybody said that working on a thing that doesn&#039;t even compile is no fun. But still everybody wanted to get his fair share of this no-fun, and we saw the number of commits sky-rocket, which means that the no-fun period is almost over after a very short time. But hopefully that does not mean that we loose the fresh energy which was brought to us by the change to KDE 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And if you cannot believe that it doesn&#039;t run:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://reserv.at/amarok/amarok-2.0-crash-osx.png&quot;  title=&quot;Amarok 2.0&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://reserv.at/amarok/amarok-2.0-crash-osx-small.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:13:52 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://amarok.kde.org/blog/archives/299-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Face-lifting amaroK</title>
    <link>http://amarok.kde.org/blog/archives/93-Face-lifting-amaroK.html</link>
            <category>aumuell</category>
    
    <comments>http://amarok.kde.org/blog/archives/93-Face-lifting-amaroK.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://amarok.kde.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=93</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://amarok.kde.org/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=93</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Martin Aumueller)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    At K4M, we decided that amaroK&#039;s context view should get a more prominent place. After some discussion, a tabbed Playlist/Context/Wiki/Lyrics view seemed to be the way to go. So we just did a dirty hack to try it out:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://img82.imageshack.us/my.php?image=tabbed8ko.png&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/1599/tabbed8ko.th.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This could somehow work, but Florian from Open Usability pointed a lot of problems, and we haven&#039;t been satisfied with the huge number of tabs either (&quot;4 is just too many&quot; is a recurring theme here). So we did a second try using a splitter:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://img110.imageshack.us/my.php?image=splitter1lk.png&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://img110.imageshack.us/img110/6835/splitter1lk.th.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This showed that actual code for experimenting is much better than just mock-ups. And it also showed us that we prefer this Kmail-like look - expect this to see in one of your next amaroK installs! 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 06:02:31 -0400</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://amarok.kde.org/blog/archives/93-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>