Friday, December 5. 2008From the Post 2.0.0 Git Vaults, Amarok Urls and BookmarksTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I'd like to be one of the first to say congratulations on reaching this milestone. I've been using amarok from svn for a couple of months now and it rocks like no other. You guys deserve a party (and then some) for all the work you've put into it.
I'm just wondering about any info on supported media devices of amarok2. Amarok 1.4 used to support the rio karma. Might that have been kept? Any chance we'll see more work in that area, ala bug# 155877? Awesome work!
Not for 2.0. Amarok2.0 will support ipods and mtp devies. The rest will come later.
Unfortunately no, but the framework exists to add it in at a later time if someone wants to.
The above link amarok://navigate/service/Magnatune.com/artist-album/artist:"Brad Sucks" predictably broke at the quoting right before Brad, making the actual link appear as only amarok://navigate/service/Magnatune.com/artist-album/artist:
Hope you can fix that, and possibly support standard URL encoding for cases like this. ;o)
Congrats on being this close to release! Amarok 2 is an excellent player and the first media player in a while that I would say is truly innovative (that being said, until media device support works better and dynamic collections is implemented it looks like I'm still stuck with 1.4
Please just name the protocol
rok: that would make it easier for other apps to support it. Think X-Platform and X-App, please.
I don't think rok is any better, it's still doesn't make any sense for other media players to support a protocl named rok.
I do think we should try and standardize the urls and the protocol, and perhaps go with a freedesktop standard so that this becomes used more frequently.
RE: The URL structure. Do we really need the "command" part? Couldn't `amarok://navigate/service/Magnatune.com/artist-album/artist:"Brad Sucks` just as easily be something like `amarok://services/Magnatune.com/artist-album/artist:"Brad Sucks"`
The command part is mainly there because other people have expressed interest in using this system for all sorts of other stuff. For instance, I know that one dev is looking into using this system to "bookmark" locations within a track, and this will require a different url
One of the features I would like to see coming back in the next Amarok 2.1 is Audio CD support!
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174565
Arhg!!! 8 untranslated/fuzzy Dutch strings, committed some hours too late!
However: Congrats with the new release! Already liked the beta's.
Dont playlists already provide some of this, i.e., the ability to save a number of tracks or locations and load them at will?
I love Amarok for all of its features and they have in fact become much easier to discover, but I hope you guys begin thinking about balancing features, discoverability, learnability in a way that keeps Amarok being the greatest player around.
I am surprised to be the only commenter here to think that Amarok 2.0 is not ready to be released yet!
I've been testing the svn versions and it has too many bugs. I think one or 2 more RCs would be needed before 2.0.
Please do not use the hostname field of a URL for something that is not a hostname.
It will be treated as hostname and will be transformed accordingly. Any other parts of the URL are kept unchanged. |
Amarok LinksCalendarQuicksearchCategoriesBlog Administration |