Tuesday, January 5. 2010About "Good Music" - Part 2: Rock![]() This is the second part of my series of articles about "good music", which was originally planned to become a series of three. In the first article of this series I had talked about Progressive Rock. The plan was to do a follow-up on Electronic Music, and then one on Classical Music, but somehow I got inspired today to write about Rock Music instead, so I'm changing the plan a little. As a preface I should again say that this is of course highly subjective. Tastes differ wildly, and talking about art is especially subjective. Why am I writing this? As a developer of a music player I simply get to hear a lot of music (all day, basically), and I've always been fascinated by music, although I'm personally not a musician. So, take all of this with a grain of salt. What motivated me to write this second part is that I did actually get some very nice feedback on the first article, including a fellow KDE developer talking to me at the Gran Canaria Desktop Summit about this article, which I thought was really nice. Apparently there is some interest in talking about music, so let's just do that Now I should explain why I originally didn't plan to write about Rock Music. The reason is a bit weird: I am somewhat ashamed of admitting that I do enjoy Rock, simply because there's so much crap in this genre. Again, this is highly subjective, but I just don't consider run-of-the-mill Rock very exciting. However, some bands managed to do Rock with a twist, either by adding components of other genres to it, or simply by being freaking good. Most of these "freaking good" bands also are versatile though, and they do incorporate different styles into their music. QueenIt is pretty hard to describe Queen briefly. It's also pretty hard not to hit superlatives when talking about them, because they were very super in many regards. I personally consider Queen the best rock band of all times, that's probably the best way to sum it up. Queen also happened to be my first "love" in music, and to this day I love them just as much as I did when I was 14. What made them so special? First of all, their singer Freddie Mercury was simply as good as singers can get. Incredible vocal range, fantastic and unique voice. Freddie Mercury died in 1991 from AIDS, one of the first prominent victims of this virus. Back then this caused quite the media stir, as Freddie was more or less openly gay, and the media tried to do the best they could to explain that "the guy died because he was gay". I'm missing words to describe this stupidity, so let's switch to Brian May, their guitarist. May is in fact "Dr May" now, as he has recently completed his PhD in astrophysics, and he's currently listed at #39 of Rolling Stone magazine's "100 Greatest Guitarists of All Time". It's hard to call the man anything else than a genius, if you have ever listened to his compositions and guitar work. Freddie Mercury was able to switch effortlessly between Falsetto voice and Modal voice (what you would consider the normal voice), without really pausing or causing a hitch in the transition. As far as I know, this is pretty difficult to do, and not mastered by many. In my mind, I always had the image of him using his voice more like a musical instrument than just a voice, much like a trumpet. He was able to start deep, and then lifting it up, higher and higher. If you try that at home, chances are you'll end up with a sore throat next morning. If you care about music at all, you should listen to some Queen songs. Some recommendations for especially good songs: "Bohemian Rhapsody", "Who Wants To Live Forever", "The Show Must Go On". U2This band is a bit of a strange bag. I have some sort of love/hate relationship with them, caused by a moral dilemma: Their music is among the best you can get. Their believe system is comparable to a fruit cake. U2 is an Irish band, but these days they are more like a worldwide corporation. Their singer Bono is a bit of a controversial person. On the one hand, the guy is simply a good singer. On the other hand, he tends to get a bit over his head, meddling in politics, trying to cure world hunger, and kissing the Pope's ring. One of his latest escapades even made it to Slashdot. You be the judge if this man can be liked. My opinion: It's important to separate the personal from the professional. And professionally, this band simply is damn good. Bringing us to the next important band member: The Edge, who is the guitarist and main composer of U2. I personally find him more likable than Bono, but all this is of little relevance. What is relevant to me is that Edge is a very good guitarist, with a unique style that is different from most other guitarists. His electrical guitar soli are rarely there for showing off, but more for creating a mood, and that he does masterfully. It is important to note that most of U2's brilliant albums (they also made some crappy ones) were co-written by Brian Eno, who is widely known as one of the most influential persons in the music industry. My suspicion is that Eno is the true mastermind behind U2, as all albums with him tend to be masterful. The rest, not so much. Some recommendations for U2 songs: "One", "With Or Without You", "Unknown Caller". Honorable MentionsHere are some more "rock" artists that I enjoy (they are all not classic rock'n' roll bands, but let's keep it at that): I hope you enjoyed this article a bit, thanks for reading! And as always - I'd love to hear some feedback Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Hey!
I have to say I really appreciate blogs about musical taste etc... The bands you mention are pretty "classic" bands though, they all got pretty big and stuff... Imo there are way more good bands which didn't get that much recognition from the Mainstream... Just wanna mention "Thrice" here, as this is the band which influenced me most so far... they started out being kind of a "Skate-Punk"-Band, but really grew into being a Alternative-Rock band... Lukas
Nice article
p.s. I love amarok, keep up the good work p.p.s. nice photo
I would suggest that you give the first three Queen albums a spin (well, actually Queen II and Sheer Heart Attack), as well as the live album Live Killers and you will notice that they were actually quite heavy (and quite overlooked). Their early shows (around 1972/1973) are raw excellence.
you forget to mention Rammstein.
The international most succesfull music group with german lyrics. I think that is nothing to forget about especially for a KDE/amarok developer
I did forget about that band for a good reason. Every sane German is ashamed about them. Simple as that.
Happy new year and thanks for amarok!
Music style preferences aside, could you explain in what way being homosexual was not the cause or the main factor that caused Freddie's death? I believe that the correlation between homosexuality and AIDS is firmly established in the scientific literature, what am I missing?
That's just stupid, HIV can infect anybody and has nothing with sexual preferences to do. I think you need to read up some so here are a link for your education. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV_and_AIDS_misconceptions#HIV_can_infect_only_homosexual_men_and_drug_users
Well, you missed like 10+ years of scientific facts and research, then, I don't know what scientific literature you are reading, but it's certainly not up-to-date.
It's getting frustrating to see people claiming that being a homosexual has nothing to do with contracting HIV. It is an established fact (this includes the reference Jonorland posted, i.e. anal sex has the highest risk of infection) that common homosexual activity (i.e. employed mainly by homosexuals) is the main contributing factor to the spreading of HIV in the developed world; acting as if this were false will only make it less likely that people make decisions early that may save their lives...
By scientific literature I mean, for example, the latest WHO health report (2009, men vs women infection rates, leading mode of transmission is sex between men). The wikipedia article on Freddie Mercury reports that a homosexual affair caused his HIV infection...
I do not think that "nobody" wanted to imply that only homosexual people can be infected by AIDS. Obviously this is not the case.
I think that in 1991 the percentage of homosexuals infected with HIV was higher compared to heterosexuals. Thus, I could imagine that some correlation between being homosexual and having HIV exists. Now, correlation does not allow us to make statements about causality or implications like "Freddie got AIDS because he was gay", for the same reason that an increase of stork population does not mean that more babies can be expected (though both are correlated, http://www.zeit.de/2006/25/Stimmt-s_P-25_xml ). For example, being gay could be correlated with the number of sexual partners, sexual practices, etc. These parameters are surely correlated with the the probability to get HIV. Thus, having less sexual partners would surely have helped. Sorry, for going offtopic. Thanks for Amarok!!!
You're missing so much that it's not worth replying to it, really. Please get informed better. Wikipedia is a good start.
You might also like these band Marillion, Linkin Park.
Mind you, I do like some of Rammstein music. Sonne is their best work, as there an opera singer in there which really cool. Definitely not a traditional rock/heavy metal music. I am mainly into electronic music (synthesizer) such as Jean Michel Jarre, DJ Saryon, Paul van Dyk, Ian van Dahl, OMD and The Human League. Do you have any favourite from jamendo.com?
About Marillion: I did mention them in the first part of this series, about "Progressive Rock". I'm a major fan of Marillion, so yes: Fully agreed.
Regarding Electronic Music, I also like Jean-Michel Jarre and Paul van Dyk very much. But that will be reserved for the third part of the series
What's great about the bands you mention is that they live forever. New generations enjoy Queen and the like just as much as we do. The other day when I heard from my son (19) room "Cold As Ice" from Foreigner blasting, I was quite surprised!
Talking about, IMHO besides Bohemian Rhapsody etc. one must mention "Under pressure", a wonderful song which is totally underestimated and which was created by two of the best singers/songwriters, Freddy Mercury and David Bowie*!
*If you wonder: I'm talking about the Bowie before ~1980, whose songs they unfortunately don't play often on the radio.
Fully agreed, "Under Pressure" is one of their best songs.
But then, they made so many good songs, if you start listing them, where to stop?
I love all your picks, but there is some great NEW rock music coming out. Black Rebel Motorcycle Club, The White Stripes, AFI, and Spoon are some of my favorites, along with local bands like Nirvana, Pearl Jam, Alice in Chains, Audioslave, and so many more. And where are the women on your list? My god, K.T. Tunstall, Rilo Kiley, Paramore? And old-school, Joan Jett, Heart, and Aretha. If you like R.E.M., I have a ton of alternative bands you should here.
Plus you left out the BEATLES!
Yes, you're right, I should probably have mentioned the Beatles. But then, they are so famous that there isn't much left to talk about them. At this point their music has almost become folklore, in a way.
Also, the quality of their material differed a lot. Much of it was fantastic, but listening to it today again, I can't help feeling that some is sub-par too. And if you listen to some of McCartney's solo works, much of that really is quite horrible. He did write gems like "Let It Be", but most of the good stuff was written by Lennon, I think.
[quote]simply because there's so much crap in this genre[/quote]
There has always been so much crap in every genre, and of course mass media means that you get to hear more of it. the 17th, 18th, 19th centuries provided us with some very fine music, but I'm willing to bet that there was just as much crap then as there is now. The best in any genre lives on. The rest is, thankfully, forgotten.
That's a good point, and you're completely right about this. Every genre comes with good and bad music, not just Rock.
However, what annoys me a bit about Rock is that so many bands just rehash the same old stuff again, and again. And still they call it new. For example most of this "Alternative Rock" music, I don't find it much of an alternative. But, tastes differ, as they say
Well, all composers rehash their best scores. Bach did it a lot, Mozart did it extensively, certainly all classical composers who were doing contract work did it.
So do contemporary composers now, they are under contracts with the record industry who tries to squeeze out all they can get. Remember the amount of records with the same or similar name produced by Oldfield when he was squeezed by Virgin? Which reminds me of movie sequels ...
God i.....ehhh fuck it, I wrote some tig bout how this butt rock list is lame, then realized the only reason i read it was because of an app that i love....*whistle* enjoy your butt rock *whistle*...keep up the good work
Queen is the best!!!
I like "These are the days of our lives" |
Amarok LinksCalendar
QuicksearchCategoriesSyndicate This BlogBlog Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

